What if the tenant won’t sign the lease?
Filed under: Property Management, Tips for Landlords
At Condo Alexandria we use the standard deed of lease as written by the Northern Virginia Association of Realtors. There’s not much in there that would surprise a tenant. It’s pretty straight-forward: if you pay you stay.
Every now so often we encounter a tenant who won’t sign the lease or who wants to renegotiate the terms of the lease. When this happens our policy is pretty simple: we go on to the next qualified tenant. Life’s much to short to deal with problem people. Problem tenants at the outset are invariably problem tenants later on.
Related posts
When the rent check bounces …
At Condo Alexandria, we take very seriously our duties at property managers. One thing we do NOT play around with is rent checks. When a rent check bounces, we go into action taking the following actions as our discretion dictates:
- We hand deliver a letter and notice stating the check has bounced which includes a photocopy of the bounced check front and back. That notice includes a 3 day “pay or quit” notice.
- We give the tenant 72 hours to cover the check. The tenant must also pay all bank fee’s which we have been charged. Our notice makes clear that if the bad check is not covered within the time allotted, we will turn it over to the commonwealth attorney for prosecution.
- Payment must be make with either a money order or a cashier’s check. Cash or checks are not accepted.
- Condo Alexandria demand the payment be made personally. We will accept shipment only where a tracking number can verify where and when the check was sent and where it will arrive.
If the funds are not delivered in time, we take action immediately. We’ve been doing this too long and heard too many stories to let the matter linger. We can always call off an eviction, but we can never recoup lost days. We also inform the tenant that once the attorney is involved, the tenant will be responsible for those fees as well.
Related posts
Myths We Learn in Grade-School English: Never Begin Sentences with Coordinating Conjunctions
Filed under: Content, Grammar, On writing, Style, Writing 101
The Myth
Here is Grade-School Myth #2:
Never begin sentences with coordinating conjunctions like and, but, or so.
As with the other myths we explore in this series, teachers spread this particular myth among children for good reason. Children—unless they are writing savants—do not know the appropriate times to begin sentences with conjunctions. They do not yet grasp transitions, nor do they grasp why they should use transitions. As adults, though, we can understand these concepts, so we should employ them in our writing.
Transitions: Essential to Effective Writing
What do I mean by transitions? Transitions are words, phrases, or even sentences that allow your writing to flow from one idea to the next.
Transitions connect your sentences, your paragraphs, and your ideas. For example, notice how I ask a question at the beginning of this paragraph about a point I made in the preceding paragraph; that’s a type of transition (paragraph-to-paragraph transition). Notice how, in the last sentence you read, the phrase, “for example,” connects to the sentence that precedes it. (That is a sentence-to-sentence transition.)
So why do we need transitions? Well, it’s just good, common sense: transitions keep our readers reading. Transitions carry ideas from sentence to sentence. They keep the reader on a smooth, uninterrupted track as they experience our prose. Readers, like anyone, want to be well served. They like their reading experience to be convenient, and maybe even the slightest bit entertaining. Is that too much to ask, you think?
Well, think about it. We are asking people to take time out of their lives to read our ideas and opinions. The very least we can do is serve them with a smooth, readable style. Aside from writing clearly and having something worth saying, the chief rule for serving readers is to write with smooth transitions. As with other endeavors like cooking or show-business, bringing our readers a convenient, pleasurable experience often involves some degree of inconvenience on our part. Paradoxically, an effortless experience for the reader requires great efforts from the writer.
The reward for these efforts is that your audience reads your work from start to finish. Also, readers are more likely to buy your ideas if they like the way you express them. And, even if they still disagree with your assertions, readers will at least give you credit for an enjoyable, easy read. We have many tools available for creating transitions. Sometimes, a well placed “also” or “in addition” creates a quick but helpful transition. Also, we have handy phrases like “for example” and “for instance” that connect an example to the ongoing discussion. These are generic, run-of-the-mill transition words and phrases, but they work. The best writers use them. Still, the best writers also make sure to use creative transitions.
What do I mean by creative transitions? Well, consider this paragraph I am writing here. Look at that first sentence—a question that references my language in the previous sentence. This is one great way to create a transition: explain what you mean by a certain phrase or word you used in the preceding sentence or paragraph. This technique creates transition—connection with the earlier sentence or paragraph—but it also shows your readers that you care about their needs; it shows that you genuinely want your readers to get your ideas, such that you will go to extra effort to get those ideas across. This attitude is important. I hope you see it in my writing.
Coordinating Conjunctions Create Transitions
So, what do coordinating conjunctions have to do with transitions?
Everything. Coordinating conjunctions are a great way to create spontaneity in your writing. They are not so stodgy and self-important as words like however, thus, or therefore. Who talks like that, anyway? Why can’t our writing and our speaking be one?
I think for the best writers, writing and speaking are one. For many academic writers, they are not. (That’s one reason that almost no one—not even academics—really enjoys reading academic prose, although they may pretend to enjoy it. Sure, they may enjoy the ideas that the writing expresses, but I doubt that anyone enjoys the style.)
But how exactly does starting sentences with coordinating conjunctions make your writing everyday or colloquial?
Well, imagine if I started the question above with however (which, by the way, is not a coordinating conjunction):
However, how exactly does starting sentences with coordinating conjunctions make your writing everyday or colloquial?
Ugh. That didn’t work. (One reason it didn’t work, aside from its excessive emphasis and formality, is the repetition of how in the adjacent words, however and how.
Let’s try the minimalist approach, by not using any transition word at all:
How exactly does starting sentences with coordinating conjunctions make your writing everyday or colloquial?
If you place that second sentence in context, it is broken from the ongoing discussion. It just drops on the reader, out of nowhere. The reader has to stop for a split-second to see the notion of but there. And that’s one thing you never want—your readers stopping because you failed to guide them. That’s work for the reader, work that is the writer’s responsibility. I think of those old ads with the scrubbing bubbles, and the motto: “We work hard so you don’t have to.” That’s a good rule for writers: writers should work hard so readers don’t have to.
Often though, it’s not even hard work. In many cases, providing helpful transitions for our readers requires minimal effort. Think of the example we explored above. All that transition took was a simple three-letter but to keep the reader on track—a very small effort for providing our readers with transition and clarity.
The Myth and Its Purpose
If sentence-starter conjunctions are such valuable tools for creating transitions, why do our grade-school teachers so often forbid this practice?
Meet little Billy, and his third-grade teacher, Mrs. Humperdinkle. Billy is writing a paragraph for an assignment entitled, “My Weekend.” Billy writes:
On Saturday I went to the mall with my mom. And we had a great time. And I ate a big pretzel. And Mom got me a shirt. And I got some toys. And I like to play with them. I like going to the mall. And I like seeing movies too.
Now, is little Billy using and to create transitions? Not really. He simply wants to show the idea of in addition to or next. A type of transition is created—sure—but Mrs. Humperdinkle wants to see Billy combine those related ideas into more substantial sentences, like this:
On Saturday I went to the mall with my Mom, and we had a great time. The best part was when I ate a big pretzel. Mom got me a shirt, but she also got me some nice toys. I like going to the mall, even more than I like seeing movies.
But Billy doesn’t use conjunctions to write this way. He is missing the connections between his sentences because he thinks purely in terms of “and” or “in addition to.” This exclusive use of and reflects the simplicity of a child’s perspective. In Billy’s mind, things simply coexist, or occur in sequence. They do not have relationships beyond coexistence and occurrence. Mrs. Humperdinkle wants Billy to think about relationships like cause-and-effect (indicated by connecting words like so, since, or because), and contradiction (but, yet, and although). There’s more to our complex, interconnected world than and, so our language should show that.
And, even if Billy learns to use advanced conjunctions like or, so, and but, Mrs. Humperdinkle knows that Billy needs to write longer sentences. And, no, she doesn’t want Billy’s sentences to be too long. (And, yes, Mrs. Humperdinkle knows not to call such sentences run-ons.) She does not want him to limit his writing to short, disconnected, chop-chop statements of fact. Mrs. Humperdinkle’s goal, then, is to force Billy to form sentences that describe realistic, complex relationships between people, actions, and events.
With that goal in mind, Mrs. Humperdinkle teaches little Billy to use conjunctions to join sentences. Since Billy has trouble thinking in terms of transitions between sentences, he must begin at the level of seeing transitions within sentences. Having assessed Billy’s level of development, Mrs. Humperdinkle orders the boy not to use conjunctions to begin sentences. She knows that using conjunctions only within sentences is not realistic for advanced writers, and that there are plenty of exceptions to the rule she is now teaching Billy. But she cannot say that to Billy! She must teach this temporary writing practice, not as something that will change with time, but as a set-in-stone absolute. Since Billy is a child, equivocal language will not get the point across to him. If Mrs. Humperdinkle says, “This rule will change later,” or even, “Try to avoid starting most sentences with conjunctions,” Billy may not stick with the program. Children think best in terms of absolutes, so Mrs. Humperdinkle must express even temporary developmental writing practices as absolutes.
While elementary-school teachers like Mrs. Humperdinkle are correct in absolutely forbidding students from beginning sentences with coordinating conjunctions, this approach has repercussions later in life, when the student attempts college-level writing. As with the myth of the run-on sentence, which we discussed in a previous article, the issue occurs when higher-level teachers do not recognize the myth and its effects on later writing. They never tell their students, “I’ll bet a lot of you learned in elementary or middle school not to begin sentences with coordinating conjunctions like and, but, or so. Well, you can do that now, but just don’t do it in every sentence. Here is how to do it. . . .” This is a conversation that must happen; otherwise Mr. Bill will continue to try to write like little Billy.
And so it goes. For us, seeing beyond these myths—and writing beyond them—is a must. So, free your mind, and experiment with those conjunctions. But don’t overuse them (as I am doing intentionally in this paragraph). And make sure not to use them so much that they lose their force (as they are in these sentences). And don’t forget that there is nothing wrong with the conventional method, as taught by Mrs. Humperdinkle. Combining ideas into complex, cohesive, fully expressed sentences is a good practice, from grade school to college—and beyond.
A Bit on Coordinating Conjunctions
Since this is a discussion of coordinating conjunctions, I should share a word or two on the seven coordinating conjunctions and how they function.
What is a coordinating conjunction? What does this fancy two-word term mean? Consider the first word of the term: coordinating. To coordinate is to manage things, such that they function in a certain way. If I coordinate a meeting, this is to say that I set up and organize the meeting, so that the events of that meeting will occur in an appropriate manner and sequence. In a similar way that people can coordinate the roles of other people, some words can coordinate other words. A coordinating conjunction, as per its name, coordinates.
Now, consider the second part of the term: conjunction. A conjunction, in general, is a joiner of two things. The same is true for language and grammar: a conjunction is a connector—a combiner. So, a coordinating conjunction joins two things.
With both parts of the term in mind, a coordinating conjunction is a word that joins two sentences, but also one that manages (or coordinates) the sentences it joins, by showing the relationship that connects those sentences. A coordinating conjunction—a conjunction that coordinates: ah-ha!
Coordinating conjunctions, though, go beyond coordinating and joining just sentences. They can also coordinate and join words, phrases, and even paragraphs. Still, when English teachers speak of coordinating conjunctions, they are usually referring to their function as sentence joiners—that is, taking two complete sentences, and joining them into a single sentence.
The table below lists the seven coordinating conjunctions and their essential functions. Whether you are using conjunctions to show transitions within sentences, between sentences, or even between paragraphs, always make sure to choose the best, most fitting conjunction for the job.
Coordinating Conjunction Function
and coexistence
but contradiction
yet contradiction
so cause and effect
or choice
nor additional negation
for precedes a cause or reason
Some of these conjunctions deserve a bit more explanation than this at-a-glance table provides. Compared with conjunctions like and or but, the conjunction nor is not a frequently used word, nor is the conjunction for frequently used. Let’s look briefly at nor and for, before moving on to the other conjunctions.
Conjunction: Nor
Nor is similar to and, except that it shows negation, or not-ness. It shows that a second item or statement is also not the case. You can think of nor as meaning not + and, or even not + or. (Actually, if you look closely at the word, nor, it appears to be a type of contraction for not + or. This is also true, for example, of the pronoun, none, which I think of as an abbreviated form of not + one—one reason that most hard-nosed grammarians consider none singular, and never plural.)
Like and or but, the conjunction nor can combine short items (like nouns), as well as sentences. Oftentimes, such appearances of nor are preceded in the sentence by the word, neither. (If you like fancy words, using that neither- nor combination is called a correlative conjunction—that is, a multiple-word conjunction that contains two words that correlate to one another.) Here are some examples of nor used in sentences:
I enjoy neither ironing, nor doing laundry. (neither-nor correlative conjunction)
Bob did not write his paper on time, nor did he bother to proofread. (coordinating conjunction)
I did not give Bob an A, nor a B, nor a C. (nor to combine negated items in a series)
Note: In this final example, you can replace nor with or, particularly if you want to achieve a colloquial, everyday tone. However, I think that nor is preferable in the sentence above, in that it drives home a sense of negativity through repeating a negation. (Think about it: I want my negative tone to come across, since I am not happy about Bob’s performance. By repeating nor, I am effectively saying, “No, no, and no.” I also want to sound a bit snobby and aloof, to show that I disapprove of Bob’s work. Nor achieves both of those goals perfectly.)
For: Sometimes a Conjunction, Often a Preposition
The other conjunction I want to mention is for. This word can be confusing, for it serves another role as a preposition. Notice how in the previous sentence I used for to combine two sentences. The first sentence communicates the effect (for can be confusing), and the second sentence reveals the cause of that effect (the reason for is confusing: it serves another role as a preposition). This application of for simply means because; however, using for instead of because creates a formal tone, in a very similar way that nor is more formal than or to show additional negation.
Here is an example in which for combines two sentences. Notice the effect-cause order.
Mrs. Humperdinkle asks little Billy not to begin sentences with conjunctions, for she knows that he does not yet grasp how to start sentences with coordinating conjunctions.
Here are the roles the two sentences play, when for combines them into a single statement:
Effect/Outcome: Mrs. Humperdinkle asks little Billy not to begin sentences with conjunctions.
, for
Cause/Reason: She knows that he does not yet grasp how to start sentences with coordinating conjunctions.
Quick Note: the coordinating conjunction so reverses this effect-cause order, creating a cause-effect combination. Consider the following inversion of the example above:
Mrs. Humperdinkle knows that little Billy does not yet grasp how to start sentences with coordinating conjunctions, so she asks him not to begin sentences with conjunctions.
One point that makes for a bit complex is that it also serves the role of preposition. Consider how for serves as a preposition in the sentence below. Notice also in this example that for does not combine two sentences.
I am writing this series of articles for anyone who remains daunted by writing rules they no longer find relevant.
In this sense, for is used to mean “in the service of,” or “for the benefit of.” In other contexts it can mean, “for purposes of,” as in the sentence below:
Good writers use transitions for clarity and readability.
In this second example, the prepositional version of for is very similar to the conjunctive form—that is, both communicate effect-cause relationships. I think that this similarity leads to some reluctance to use for as a conjunction, which leads many writers (and readers) to view it as a slightly old-fashioned convention. With this popular perception in mind, I like to use for as a coordinating conjunction when expressing an statement in a stern or formal tone:
I gave Bob an F grade, for he did not complete the course requirements, nor did he put forth any substantial effort in class.
(I slipped in a nor as well.—Now, that’s some aloof, stodgy stuff, isn’t it? My goal: to sound authoritative and intimidating.)
Yet vs. But
Yet and but are generally considered interchangeable. I disagree with this perception, since I find that yet and but express very different tones and formality levels in writing. While you can replace but with yet to show contradiction, never make this replacement arbitrarily. Reserve yet for those statements or assertions you would rather express in a formal or emphatic tone. Because it is not used as often as but in spoken conversation, yet is perceived—whether consciously or subconsciously—as the more formal conjunction. Use it when you want a very strong (and ever-so-slightly old-fashioned) sense of but-ness.
So What?
I like to use the common conjunctions (and, but, so, and or) to begin sentences, and often to begin paragraphs. Just as it does within sentences, the conjunction but expresses contradiction when it opens sentences. It tells the reader, “Pay attention: I’m about to say something in this sentence that goes against what I just said in the preceding sentence.” This creates suspense in the reader’s mind, especially if the writer had expressed the preceding sentence with a strong degree of conviction.
The conjunction so is similar to but, in that its role as a sentence opener serves a very similar function to its role as a sentence combiner. Whether it acts as a sentence starter or a sentence combiner, so introduces some effect or outcome to that which precedes it. But sometimes, it takes on an additional meaning when it kicks off new sentences. Simply put, so, when introducing a sentence or paragraph, can mean, “with that in mind,” or “to sum.” It tells the reader, “Okay, now think about everything I just said and move forward into this new discussion with that in mind.” It also retains its cause-and-effect quality, in the sense that it says, “Because of all that I just said to you in the previous paragraph(s), the point I am about to make is applicable and worth consideration.” The conjunction, so—a two-letter word—says all that? You’d better believe it!
So, when considering conjunctions as sentence or paragraph starters, make sure to consider that their functions, while similar to their mid-sentence applications, can change slightly. Did you see how I used so to open this paragraph? In that context, it means, “with the preceding paragraph’s content in mind.” Also, notice how so there is followed by a comma. That comma shows a pause of emphasis. It invites the reader to pause to notice that appearance of so. This pause invites the reader to reflect, for one moment, on the previous paragraph and its implications. It sets so apart, showcasing the point that so there means, “What I just said is important to what I’m about to say; don’t drop it just yet.”
This comma after the conjunction is a frequent, but not ubiquitous, practice for using conjunctions as sentence starters. How do we know when to place a comma and when to omit it? Recalling the article on the comma rule of thumb, your best guide for deciding whether to place that comma is to listen to the sentence. Read the sentence aloud, and make sure to read it naturally, in the same way that you would speak it. If you hear yourself pause after the opening conjunction, then place a comma. If the 0pening conjunction runs into the word that follows it without any pause, do not place a comma. (Note: I find that so, when used to start sentences, is followed by a comma more often than and or but.)
Coming up: Yet More Sentence Starting Myths
Well, that’s it for this myth of grade-school English. So go forth, dear reader, and use those coordinating conjunctions for all they’re worth.
It’s time now to move on to Myth #3: Never begin sentences with because. Stay tuned.
Christopher Altman is a college English instructor who specializes in community-college composition. He has
taught at Corning Community College (NY) and Mansfield University of Pennsylvania. Mr. Altman has published work in the field of medieval literature, and has authored a book on advertising language entitled, Telling the Truth to Deceive: How Advertisers Manipulate the English Language.
Related posts
A house or a home?
When I’m talking to clients about real estate, I find that the biggest difference between a house and a home—or a condo and a home—is that a home is where you live or where you will live.
A house (or condo) is where the other guy lives. When a potential client refers to a property as a home, there is a good chance that the client is considering buying the property. When a client refers to his own home as a home, he indicates an emotional attachment to the property that may make it hard to think rationally when considering all factors regarding the sale of this marketable commodity. If you think of your home as a house or just a condo, then you’re already emotionally ready to move on to the next place.
Related posts
St. Patrick’s Day Parade in Arlington
Filed under: Arlington, Clarendon, Court House, Events
St. Patrick’s Day Parade is tomorrow March 16th in Arlington between Clarendon and Court House. The fun will include floats, people and animals in costume, and more.
The parade starts at 8 pm on Barton Street and ends on Irving Street.
A few homes for sale near Clarendon
Showing properties
1 - 4 of 16.
See more
Clarendon.
(all data current as of
3/15/2010)
-
$4,300,000 : 3123 9th Rd N, Arlington5 beds, 2 full, 1 part bathsSize: n/aLot size: 21,875 sq ft
-
$1,169,000 : 1410 Johnson St N, Arlington4 beds, 3 full, 1 part bathsSize: n/aLot size: 7,073 sq ft
-
$379,500 : 1021 Garfield St N #148, Arlington1 beds, 1 full bathSize: 709 sq ftLot size: n/a
-
$395,000 : 1205 Garfield St N #510, Arlington1 beds, 1 full bathSize: 675 sq ftLot size: n/a
Listing information deemed reliable but not guaranteed. Read full disclaimer.
Related posts
Tax hike proposed in City of Falls Church
The Falls Church News Press reports:
“Falls Church City Manager Wyatt Shields unveiled his proposed $64.2 million budget to the Falls Church City Council Monday night, recommending a jump of 20 cents in the real estate tax rate from $1.07 to $1.27 on top of deep cuts in City services. Steep declines in real estate tax assessments and other impacts of the wider recession were pinpointed as the need for the measures.
Overall, the recommended budget reflects a 7.12 percent decline from last year’s budget on the City side, and a 5.5 percent decrease on the Schools’ side, including a 4.5 percent decrease in its request for City support. Overall, his budget shrinks City and school operations by a total of $2.848 million from a budget in the current year of $67.087 million to $64.238 million.”
Read the full story …
Here are a few homes for sale in Falls Church right now:
Showing properties
1 - 4 of 150.
See more
Falls Church.
(all data current as of
3/15/2010)
-
$474,000 : 3415 Frenora Ct, Falls Church4 beds, 3 full bathsSize: n/aLot size: 13,618 sq ft
-
$208,900 : 7592h Lakeside Village Dr #H, Falls Church1 beds, 1 full bathSize: 628 sq ftLot size: n/a
-
$529,000 : 7720 Marshall Heights Ct, Falls Church3 beds, 2 full, 2 part bathsSize: n/aLot size: 1,608 sq ft
-
$539,900 : 115 Great Falls St, Falls Church2 beds, 2 full, 1 part bathsSize: 1,560 sq ftLot size: n/a
Listing information deemed reliable but not guaranteed. Read full disclaimer.
Related posts
Del Ray group presents “Open Life Drawing – Poses”
Here’s your chance to hone your artistic talents. Del Ray Artisans is hosting a live models who will pose for painting or drawing. Bring your supplies to the gallery to paint or draw live models who are also practicing their talents. The models will start with 5 minute warm-up poses and work into progressively longer poses lasting ten to forty-five minutes.
Del Ray Artisans will provide chairs, but not easels, so please bring your own easel if you need one. Bring your own charcoals, paints or other media to Del Ray Artisans Gallery, 2704 Mount Vernon Avenue, Alexandria VA 22301. There fee for admission is $8 for members and $10 for non-members. Call (703) 836-1468 for more details.
photo credit: freeparking
Related posts
Del Ray Artisans
Join your local art community
Are you an artist? Whether by hobbyist or by trade you may want to consider joining Del Ray Artisans, a community of artists located at 2704 Mount Vernon Avenue in Alexandria, VA 22301. For more information call Del Ray Artisans at (703) 838-4827
Del Ray Artisans features visual and functional arts with monthly exhibits. The gallery has limited hours. It’s open from Thursday noon-4 p.m., and from May to through September only from noon to 9 pm on first Thursdays of the month. The gallery is also open on Friday noon-9 p.m., Saturday 10 a.m.-9 p.m., and Sunday noon-6 p.m.
Register for membership or read more here.
Related posts
Del Ray Easter Egg Hunt
Del Ray is a family friendly neighborhood year round, but March 28th Del Ray invites kids of all ages to participate in an Easter Egg hunt. The entire family (including leashed poochies) are encouraged to hunt for over 2000 eggs hidden along the block of Mount Vernon Avenue bounded by E. Howell and E. Winsdor Streets.
The hunt is organized by ACKC Cocoa Bar, Artfully Paper and Barkley Square. Other sponsors include Purple Goose, Executive Lock and Key Hardware, Evening Star, and Erickson & Ripper Gallery.
Another fun twist is that the plastic eggs will contain tickets for prizes and one of two snacks:
- chocolate for children
- doggy treats for pups of all ages.
The grand prize is be a 26 inch chocolate bunny made by ACKC. There is no charge for this even but at the event donations are being accepted for both the American Red Cross and the Animal Welfare League of Alexandria. For more information call Eric Nelson at (703) 635-7917.
Sample of Del Ray Homes for Sale
Showing properties
1 - 5 of 8.
See more
Del Ray.
(all data current as of
3/15/2010)
-
$542,000 : 424 Alexandria Ave E, Alexandria3 beds, 1 full bathSize: 863 sq ftLot size: 6,300 sq ft
-
$639,000 : 2707 Holly St, Alexandria3 beds, 1 full, 1 part bathsSize: n/aLot size: 4,000 sq ft
-
$359,000 : 512 Custis Ave E, Alexandria2 beds, 1 full bathSize: n/aLot size: 5,640 sq ft
-
$564,900 : 1416 Mount Vernon Ave, Alexandria3 beds, 2 full bathsSize: n/aLot size: 2,040 sq ft
-
$849,000 : 108 Mason Ave W, Alexandria3 beds, 3 full bathsSize: n/aLot size: 6,750 sq ft
Listing information deemed reliable but not guaranteed. Read full disclaimer.
Related posts
Chamber Music at the Lyceum
Members of the acclaimed Alexandria Symphony Orchestra will perform at the Lyceum in Old Town Alexandria on March 21st, 2010. The performance starts and there is NO CHARGE for the admission. For more details call 703 550 9220.
The Alexandria Symphony Orchestra provides quality, affordable and accessible music in the greater Metropolitan area of Northern Virginia. The Alexandria Symphony Orchestra supports thematic and inter-arts programming with a mixture of contemporary music
and classical pieces.
The Lyceum is located at 201 S. Washington Street, Alexandria, VA.
photo credit: nosha





